France was the first to use the word force, and the UK was close behind in calling for action against Syria. The backlash has left both countries backing out of the use of force. Should we call it appeasement? I do not believe military intervention in Syria benefits anyone. Assad is one devil, and the insurgents are backed by terrorists or the hidden devils. Europe sounds impotent as it did in handling Germany in the 1930′s. The US is a flawed nation, but the responsibility is default to America to handle Syria and now Russia.
Related articles
- France tones down Syria war rhetoric (rinf.com)
- Obama backs away from speedy Syria strike, after UK turnaround (timesofisrael.com)
- Russia sends warships to Mediterranean as Syria tensions escalate (abc.net.au)
- UK gathers warplanes, military hardware in Cyprus base near Syria (stratrisks.com)
Filed under: PERSONAL FINANCE NEWS Tagged: america, Barack Obama, Bashar al-Assad, France, Germany, Middle East, Russia, Syria, united states, war
